How can AI help a litigation or disputes practice?
Litigation AI earns its place on the mechanical, high-volume work: reviewing and timelining documents, building chronologies, tracking deadlines and tasks across matters, and drafting first passes cited to the record. The lawyer keeps the strategy and the judgment; the system removes the grind and the risk of a missed date. Built around your matters, it fits how your team actually runs a case.
What a product misses
Generic tools do not understand your matter structure, your deadlines, or your record, so document review and chronology building stay slow and manual. A general-purpose e-discovery tool can tag documents, but it cannot build a cited chronology that cross-references three witness statements and a bundle of exhibits, or track a court's own procedural deadlines alongside your internal task list. That synthesis work is where the hours go.
What we build
We build document review and chronology tools, matter and deadline tracking, and drafting support, each cited to the record and wired into how you run cases, with a human on every judgment call. We also build witness-statement and evidence cross-referencing, so contradictions and corroborations across the bundle surface automatically, and a hearing-prep pack generator that assembles the chronology, key documents, and open issues into one brief.
Is this you?
- Chronology and bundle-building is currently a manual, junior-heavy task that takes days per matter.
- You run enough active matters that deadline tracking across the caseload is a real risk, not a formality.
- Cross-referencing witness statements against documentary evidence is slow and easy to get wrong by hand.
- You want first-pass drafts grounded in the actual record, not a generic AI writing tool with no case context.
What we build for litigation & disputes
Document review & chronology
Review, tag, and timeline documents into a chronology, with every entry linked to its source page.
Matter & deadline tracking
Deadlines, tasks, and hearings tracked across the whole caseload, escalated before they land.
Drafting support
First-pass drafts and summaries grounded in the record, for the lawyer to edit and approve.
Witness & evidence cross-reference
Surface contradictions and corroborations between witness statements and documentary evidence automatically, each flagged to its source.
Hearing-prep packs
Assemble the chronology, key documents, and open issues into a single brief ahead of a hearing, instead of rebuilding it from scratch each time.
Questions
Litigation & disputes: what people ask
Does AI make things up in document review?
The system is built to cite. Every summary and chronology entry links to the source page, so a lawyer verifies in seconds, and the AI prepares while the lawyer decides.
Can it work with our document sets and DMS?
Yes. We build around your document management and matter systems rather than asking you to migrate everything into a new platform.
How are deadlines handled?
Deadlines are tracked across the caseload and escalated before they fall due, with the calculation traceable to the rule behind it.
What is the engagement model?
Fixed scope, fixed price, a v0 in 2-6 weeks, weekly demos, and full ownership on handover.
Can it flag contradictions between witness statements and documents?
Yes. Cross-referencing surfaces where a statement and the documentary record agree or conflict, each flagged with the specific passages so counsel can assess it directly.
How does hearing prep get faster?
The chronology, key documents, and open issues are already structured from the matter build, so assembling a hearing-prep pack is pulling from an existing system, not starting over the week before.
Other practice areas
See allReady to build for litigation & disputes?
One call, no deck. An honest go / no-go and a written scope by the end of the week.