Legal support services for US law firms
We do the document work your cases are built on.
adnah.
Medical chronologies. Discovery and privilege review. Diligence registers. Demand packages.
Send us the records, the production or the data room. A production system we built for legal work does the reading and the assembly; a qualified lawyer resolves every exception and signs it. You get a finished work product, with every fact cited to the page it came from.
- Turnaround
- 48 hours
- Every fact
- Cited
- Start with
- One matter
Every engagement runs under the supervision of the engaging attorney. Adnah Legal is a legal support provider, not a law firm.
Cited, not summarised
Every fact we hand you carries the document and page it came from. You can check any line in seconds, and rely on it in a filing.
A lawyer signs it
A qualified lawyer sets the scope, resolves every exception and signs the deliverable. Judgement is never left to a machine.
Systems, not headcount
We built our own legal production system, which is why a twelve-document job and a twelve-thousand-document job both make sense to run.
Priced before we start
A fixed price and a delivery date before we touch the file. No scoping cycle, no hourly meter, no minimum engagement.
How the work actually gets made
It costs less because it is built differently, not because less care goes in.
The rest of this category rents you people: a review floor, a managed team, an hourly rate. When hours are the unit of production, a small job is not worth taking and a large one gets priced like a project. We built the production system first, for legal work specifically rather than a general AI product with a legal label on it, and staffed qualified lawyers around it.
That is why twelve documents are as welcome as twelve thousand, why turnaround is measured in hours instead of weeks, and why we can give you a firm price before we have seen the file. What it does not change is who is accountable for the work: a lawyer reads it, and a lawyer signs it.
- 01
Take the file as it is
Scanned treatment records, a native production, a data room export, a system nobody supports any more. We do the OCR and the clean-up, so nobody at your firm spends a day preparing the work before sending it.
- 02
Remove what does not need reading
Document type, near-duplicate grouping and email threading, so the same content is never read twice. On a review population this alone commonly removes a third of it before anyone reads a page.
- 03
Extract what the deliverable needs
Treatment dates and providers, change-of-control and assignment triggers, timestamps, amounts, obligations, holdings, citations - pulled against a schema built for the specific deliverable, not a generic summary of each document.
- 04
Bind every fact to its source
Each fact carries the document and the page it came from. That one rule is what makes the output usable in a demand, a motion or a diligence report, and what lets you check it instead of trusting it.
- 05
Score the doubt and route it
Every output carries a confidence score. Anything below the line goes to a lawyer's queue instead of into your file, and we report the distribution to you rather than quietly absorbing it.
- 06
A lawyer resolves and signs
A qualified lawyer works the exception queue, samples the rest against the source and signs the deliverable. Privilege, materiality and strategy never run on rails.
And the four lines we do not cross.
- No client data trains any model, ours or anyone else's.
- Privilege and materiality calls are never automated. The system proposes; a lawyer decides.
- Nothing enters a deliverable without a source document and page behind it.
- No deliverable leaves us unread. A named qualified lawyer reviews and signs it.
Stated on every service we offer
You should never have to take “AI-powered” on faith. Every service we publish says how much of that deliverable our system produces and how much of it a lawyer does by hand, including the jobs where the machine barely helps at all.
- Fully pipelined
- Our pipeline produces the deliverable end to end. A qualified lawyer samples the output and signs it before it leaves us.
- Pipeline-led
- The pipeline produces 70 to 90 percent of the work. A lawyer resolves every exception it flags rather than reviewing everything it got right.
- Lawyer-led
- A lawyer's judgement runs through the middle of the work. The pipeline accelerates the reading, searching and assembly around it rather than producing the answer.
- Access-bound
- The constraint here is access to sources or real-world action rather than analysis. We automate the tracking and the chasing; the waiting is the work.
Different practices. The same bottleneck.
A personal injury lawyer holds a file that is worth nothing until the records are chronologised, the bills reconciled and the demand assembled. That is weeks of paralegal time per case, spent on a contingency you have not earned yet.
A criminal defense attorney is handed a drive of body-cam, jail calls and reports, with a court date that does not move. Somebody has to watch all of it and find the Brady material before the state does.
A civil litigator has a production to code, a privilege log to build and damages to model, none of it billable at a rate the client will accept without an argument.
A corporate team on an acquisition has thousands of contracts to read for change of control, assignment, exclusivity and indemnity, against a signing date that was fixed before diligence began.
None of that is where your judgement earns its rate. It is the reading, the sorting and the assembly that has to happen first. That is the part we take.
- Against internal cost
- 60–85% less
- Standard turnaround
- 48 hrs
- Practice areas
- 27
The same unit of work, both prices.
Published rate-card ranges against what the same unit costs without us.
- Demand package assembly85% lower$400–1,200 / package$2,500–8,000 without us
- Standard-of-care chronology82% lower$600–1,800 / case$3,000–10,000 without us
- High-volume document review61% lower$800–2,500 / 1,000 docs$2,500–6,000 without us
- Due diligence contract review75% lower$20–60 / contract$80–240 without us
Four steps, and nothing for your firm to adopt.
No platform to roll out, no integration to build, no volume to commit to and nothing for your lawyers to learn. You send the work in whatever form you already hold it, and a finished work product comes back for your review and signature. Most firms are live on their first matter the same week they ask.
01
Send us the file
Records, a production set, a data room link, a box of scans. Whatever form you already hold it in, by secure upload or your own file share. Nothing to install, no account to set up.
02
Get a price and a date
Usually within a few hours: what it will cost, exactly what you will receive, and when. You decide with the number already in front of you, before any work starts.
03
We build the work product
Our system does the reading, the extraction and the assembly. A qualified lawyer runs the matter around it, resolves every exception and checks the output back against the record.
04
You review, adopt and sign
A finished work product arrives ready for your review and signature, with revisions until it matches the agreed scope. The work is yours; the professional responsibility stays with you, as it must.
What those four steps look like
Three matters, start to finish.
Illustrative rather than client work: we do not publish other firms’ matters. The prices and turnarounds are the published ones, and the comparison figures are what the same work costs a firm that does it without us.
Personal injury
A rear-end case with 1,400 pages of records
- You send
- The full record set, the bills, the police report. Scanned, unsorted, in whatever order the providers sent them.
- You get back
- A treatment chronology with a page citation on every entry, a damages schedule reconciling billed against paid, and a demand package built around both.
$850–2,500 the whole file
$4,200–13,000 to build the same file internally
48 hours
Civil litigation
A 12,000-document production, three weeks from the cutoff
- You send
- The production as you received it. Native files, an export, a drive - no processing needed before it reaches us.
- You get back
- The population de-duplicated and threaded, coded for responsiveness, privilege and issue tags, and a court-ready privilege log with the basis stated entry by entry.
$800–2,500 per 1,000 docs
$2,500–6,000 per 1,000 docs before the log is drafted
48 hours
Corporate, mergers and acquisitions
A data room of 900 contracts and a signing date that will not move
- You send
- Data room access, your materiality threshold, and the issue list the deal actually turns on.
- You get back
- A findings register by contract and by issue with cited excerpts, a materiality filter applied, and a consent schedule ready to drive the disclosure schedules.
$20–60 per contract
$80–240 per contract at a firm
1 to 3 weeks
What you get back
Finished work product, not a pile of notes.
What comes with the price
Five commitments, on every job we take.
These are not service values on a wall. They are the terms we work to, they go in the engagement letter, and each of them costs us something when we get the work wrong. That is what makes them worth reading.
How this compares to the alternatives →- The price is the price
- Quoted before we start and fixed unless you change the scope in writing. No hourly meter running underneath it, and no invoice that arrives larger than the number you agreed.
- 48 hours is the standard, not the best case
- Where a service needs longer, the longer figure is published on its own page before you send anything. You should never learn a turnaround after committing to it.
- Every fact carries its source
- Document and page, on every line. If an assertion cannot be traced back to the record, it does not go into your deliverable at all.
- Revisions are free until the scope is met
- If the work comes back short of what we agreed, we fix it at no cost. If we cannot get it there, you do not pay for it.
- You always know what the machine did
- Every service publishes how much of it our system produces, and the confidence distribution ships with the work instead of staying with us.
Practice areas
Every practice has its own document problem.
- Cross-practice13 services
- Personal injury5 services
- Family law3 services
- Criminal defense2 services
- Real estate3 services
- Corporate, mergers and acquisitions7 services
- Employment law3 services
- Estate planning2 services
- Civil litigation2 services
- Immigration3 services
- Insurance defense2 services
- Bankruptcy2 services
- Intellectual property rights2 services
- Regulatory research and compliance2 services
- Healthcare compliance1 service
- Construction1 service
- Securities2 services
- Medical malpractice2 services
- Appellate2 services
- Franchise law1 service
- Privacy and data protection4 services
- Antitrust1 service
- Artificial intelligence governance3 services
- Mass tort3 services
- Cryptocurrency and digital assets1 service
- Cannabis regulation1 service
- Sports and entertainment law1 service
How we work
What the technology does, and where it stops.
Most providers stay vague about this, and vagueness is how bad work reaches a client file. Our system reads, de-duplicates, classifies, extracts and assembles, at a speed and scale no team can match. It does not decide what is privileged, what is material or what your strategy should be. A qualified lawyer sets the scope, resolves every flagged exception and signs off. Nothing unreviewed is ever delivered.
Your data never trains a model
Your files, your prompts and your outputs are never used to train any model, ours or a third party's.
Never a public chatbot
Client material never passes through a consumer AI product, and access on our side is limited to named individuals.
NDA before the first file
A conflicts check and a signed confidentiality agreement come before a single document moves.
Why we sell the work, not the software
We built the system. We are not going to sell it to you.
The obvious business model for what we built is a subscription: licence the platform, charge your firm per seat, let your people run it. We decided against it, because that model quietly hands the work back to you. Somebody still has to upload the records, run the tool, check what it produced, catch what it got wrong and assemble the deliverable - and that somebody bills at a rate which makes the licence the cheapest part of the arrangement.
So we sell the finished work product instead. Nothing to implement, nothing for your lawyers to learn, no seats to justify at renewal, and no internal argument about whether people are using the thing the firm bought. You send the matter. The deliverable comes back with a lawyer’s signature on it.
Sample output
Judge the work before you send us a file.
Name the deliverable you want to assess, a chronology, a privilege log, a diligence register, and we will build a complete, unedited example from a public document set. Same format, same citations, same standard and same turnaround you would get on a real matter. Then decide.
Ask for a sample →What we are, and what we are not
Supervision and scope.
Adnah Legal provides legal support services to licensed attorneys and legal departments. We work under your supervision and direction. We are not a law firm, we do not practise law in any US jurisdiction, and we do not form an attorney-client relationship with your clients.
Every deliverable is a work product for your review, revision and adoption. Professional responsibility for the matter rests with you throughout, which is precisely why we cite every fact to its source: the person carrying that responsibility should be able to check the work, not merely trust it. We run a conflicts check before accepting any engagement and execute a confidentiality agreement before receiving a single file.
Pricing structure
Start small. Scale only if the work earns it.
Pilot
One real matter at the published rate, so you can judge the work with very little at stake. Most firms start here, and we would rather they did.
Per matter
Send work as it arises. A fixed price per unit, agreed before we start, with no minimum volume and no monthly commitment to sign.
Monthly retainer
For steady volume: an agreed monthly minimum at bracket pricing, priority turnaround, and a named lawyer who learns your formats and conventions.
Who does the work
Adnah Legal is led by Raghav R Handa, a lawyer who has spent nine years building technology for the work lawyers actually do.
He built and led product at one of India's largest legal platforms and created LexOS, a legal operating system now used by 3,000+ lawyers across 40+ countries. It matters here for one reason: the people who designed this production system have done the work it produces, and the people who sign the output are qualified to judge it.
Who you would be working with →FAQ
What firms ask before they send the first file.
Are you a law firm?
No. We are a legal support services provider. We work under the supervision of the engaging attorney, we do not advise your clients, and we do not practise law in any US jurisdiction.
How do I know the work is accurate?
Every fact in a deliverable carries the document and page it came from, so you can verify any line in seconds rather than taking it on trust. Before it reaches you, a qualified lawyer resolves every exception the system flags and checks a sample back against the source.
Is one matter too small to send?
No. A single matter is a normal first engagement and it is how most of our clients start. If the work comes back short of the agreed scope we revise it at no cost, and if we cannot get it right, you do not pay.
How do you keep our client data confidential?
An NDA before any file moves, encrypted transfer and storage, named-individual access only, no model training on your data, and deletion on request. Full details are in our method and data note.
One next step
Send us one matter.
Book fifteen minutes to talk it through, or skip the call and send a single job so you can judge the output on your own file. Either way you get a fixed price and a delivery date, usually the same day.