Pricing
One number, quoted up front. No line items.
We hold ourselves to the pricing model we run: fixed fee, named deliverables, honest scope, no lock-in. If we can't quote a single number after the intake call, we haven't understood your practice well enough yet.
The full pass. Name, systematise, automate - the operating model delivered end to end, working artefacts inside the practice from week two.
- ·Two weeks of practice-side observation
- ·Written map of your six primitives
- ·Matter template, action library, role chart
- ·Two to four production agents
- ·Handover so the firm runs it, not us
Optional. A light monthly relationship that extends the model as the practice grows - new actions, new agents, quarterly review, no lock-in.
- ·New actions added as needed
- ·Agent tuning against real matters
- ·Quarterly primitive review
- ·One month notice, either side, always
Cost, answered plainly
Why won't you publish a number?
Because sequence and scope vary by starting condition - a solo immigration practice and a two-partner litigation shop need different depth of work. We quote a single fixed number per firm, after the intake call, and we hold to it.
Is it really fixed, or fixed-with-exceptions?
Fixed. One number, agreed before work starts, no change orders for scope we should have anticipated. If the practice's needs genuinely change mid-transformation, we say so and re-quote in writing - we don't drip in extra line items.
What determines the number?
Firm size, number of matter types in regular use, and starting condition - how much is already named versus entirely undocumented. A three-lawyer firm with one clean matter type costs less to transform than a solo practice running six distinct services.
Do you ever discount based on firm size?
The fee scales with scope, not a separate discount tier. A simpler practice, with less to name and systematise, naturally lands on a lower number.
What happens if we want to stop after the audit but before the transformation?
That's a normal, fine outcome. The AI Readiness Audit is free and has no obligation attached. Some firms use it, decide to do the naming work themselves, and never apply - that's a legitimate use of the tool.