Case studies · 6 transformations · 2024–2026

Firms we have rebuilt.

Firm names are held back at the practice's request; transformations are described honestly. Every engagement here ran the sequence in order: name, then systematise, then automate.

  • 01

    Fixed-fee immigration boutique

    Singapore · Solo + 2 · Transformation: 9 weeks

    A solo practitioner with a paralegal, drowning in visa-refusal appeals. We built a matter container, published fixed pricing, and put a first-pass drafting agent on every appeal.

    MATTER transformationIntake automationDrafting agents
    Read the full case study
    Turnaround
    5 days → 18 hours
    Matters / month
    12 → 34
    Effective rate
    +3.1×
  • 02

    Two-partner IP litigation shop

    India · 2 partners + 4 · Transformation: 14 weeks

    Prosecution work bottlenecked on citation checks and prior-art review. We rebuilt evidence as a graph of anchors and turned research into a compounding stock rather than a folder of memos.

    Evidence anchoringResearch stockTeam roles
    Read the full case study
    Citation errors
    → 0 in QA
    Prior-art hours
    −72%
    Repeat questions
    answered from stock
  • 03

    Cross-border disputes solo

    UAE / India · Solo · Transformation: 6 weeks

    One lawyer running arbitrations across three jurisdictions. Deadlines lived in a diary and a prayer. We built structured dates, per-action duration data, and shifted the practice to fixed engagement fees.

    Time primitiveDeadline surfacingFixed pricing
    Read the full case study
    Missed dates
    → 0
    Pricing model
    Hourly → Fixed
    Client NPS
    +41 pts
  • 04

    Property law micro-firm

    India · 3 lawyers · Transformation: 11 weeks

    A three-lawyer firm where each partner ran their matters their own way. We extracted the shared action library and defined doer/reviewer roles per action - the firm ran the same playbook by the sixth week.

    Action libraryPlaybook extractionReviewer roles
    Read the full case study
    Onboarding time
    3 mo → 2 wks
    Handoff failures
    −88%
    Concurrent matters
    +2.4×
  • 05

    Startup counsel practice

    Singapore · Solo + 1 · Transformation: 8 weeks

    A generalist counsel practice serving early-stage founders, buried in near-identical incorporation, cap-table, and SAFE-note matters priced by the hour despite being highly repeatable.

    Matter templatesIntake automationEvidence anchoring
    Read the full case study
    Time to engagement
    1 week → same day
    Matters / month
    8 → 22
    Weekend hours
    −90%
  • 06

    Family law boutique

    UAE · Solo + 2 · Transformation: 10 weeks

    A sensitive, high-touch practice area where the founder worried automation would feel cold to clients. We built the operating model behind the scenes, leaving the client-facing relationship untouched.

    Team rolesResearch stockFixed pricing
    Read the full case study
    Research hours
    −65%
    Founder client-time
    +40%
    Pricing model
    Hourly → Fixed

2027 slots

Two remaining, this cohort.

Start your AI transformation