Mass tort legal support
Fully pipelinedIntake screening against eligibility criteria
Campaigns generate thousands of intakes and most of them do not qualify. Screening them by hand consumes the budget before the qualified cases are found. We screen the population against your criteria at a few dollars a claimant and tell you where the unqualified ones are coming from.
- Published price
- $8–25 / claimant
- Turnaround
- 24 to 48 hours
- Without us
- $30–100 / claimant
Fixed per unit, not hourly. No minimum engagement. Quoted before we start.
How we actually produce this
Our pipeline produces the deliverable end to end. A qualified lawyer samples the output and signs it before it leaves us.
The pipeline is ours. It was built for legal work rather than adapted from a general product, which is why the price for this service is a published number instead of an hourly estimate.
- Why this work leaves a firm
- Campaigns generate thousands of intakes and most do not qualify. Screening them manually consumes the budget before the qualified cases are found.
- What our pipeline does
- We encode your eligibility criteria as an explicit rule set covering product identification, exposure window, injury type, diagnosis timing and statute of limitations, then run every intake against it with a qualified, disqualified or indeterminate outcome and the reason attached.
- Where a lawyer steps in
- The indeterminate queue and any criterion change.
- What it changes
- Screening cost falls by 70 to 80 percent against manual review, and the campaign statistics let you retarget advertising toward sources producing qualified claimants.
What you receive
Every intake screened with an outcome and a reason, an indeterminate queue, and campaign-level statistics.
Volume brackets apply above 100 claimants and the unit price falls substantially at campaign scale. Screening is against your criteria only - it is not a merits assessment and it is not a decision to accept a client.
- A screened claimant list with a qualify or decline outcome for every record
- The specific reason for each outcome, tied to the criterion it turned on
- An indeterminate queue of claimants the criteria cannot resolve without a human read
- Campaign-level statistics showing which criteria are failing intakes and in what proportion
- A source-level breakdown, so you can see which advertising sources produce qualified claimants
- A duplicate and near-duplicate report across the intake population
What it costs, and what it replaces
Both figures are published ranges for the same unit of work. Ours is fixed before we start; if our process gets faster, that is our gain and your price does not move.
How engagements are structured →- Adnah Legal
- $8–25 / claimant
- Typical cost without us
- $30–100 / claimant
Roughly 75% lower at the midpoint of each published range.
How the work runs
01
Encode the criteria
Your criteria are written into an explicit decision structure and sent back to you for confirmation. Ambiguities in the criteria surface here, which is far cheaper than surfacing them after 4,000 screens.
02
Calibration batch
A sample is screened and returned for your review. Your corrections adjust the encoded criteria before the full population runs.
03
Screen the population
Every intake is screened with the outcome, the governing criterion and a confidence score recorded. Anything the criteria cannot resolve goes to the indeterminate queue rather than being declined by default.
04
Lawyer review and campaign reporting
A qualified lawyer works the indeterminate queue and samples the automatic outcomes, then the campaign statistics are compiled and delivered with the screened list.
What we need from you
- The intake records, in whatever the campaign platform exports
- Your eligibility criteria, written out - injury, exposure window, jurisdiction, prior claims, whatever governs
- How you want borderline cases handled: decline, or route to the indeterminate queue
- Any criteria that are absolute bars rather than factors
What we check before delivery
- A scored sample of automatic outcomes is checked on every batch and the agreement rate is reported
- Nothing is declined for a reason we cannot state - every outcome names the criterion it turned on
- Borderline claimants go to a human queue rather than being resolved by a threshold
- Duplicate intakes are identified across the population before screening outcomes are counted
When firms send us this
- A campaign generating intakes faster than the team can read them
- Deciding whether an advertising source is worth continuing to fund
- Re-screening a historical inventory against revised criteria
- Preparing an inventory for a co-counsel or funding conversation
Questions about intake screening against eligibility criteria
Does this decide whether to take a case?
No. It applies your stated criteria consistently and tells you what each record does and does not meet. Whether to accept a claimant is your decision and it stays yours.
What do the campaign statistics actually tell us?
Which criteria are knocking out intakes, and from which sources. Firms routinely retarget advertising off the back of it, because a source producing volume and no qualified claimants is costing twice.
How fast is a batch?
Twenty-four to forty-eight hours per batch, which is usually faster than the intakes arrive.
Firms who send us this usually also send
More in Mass tort legal support
All mass tort legal support services →
This service
Send one and judge the output.
Intake screening against eligibility criteria at $8–25 per claimant, 24 to 48 hours. No minimum, no scoping call, no onboarding cycle.